Re: linux-next: Tree for October 7 (wireless/wext)

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Wed Oct 07 2009 - 13:59:08 EST

Next message: John Kacur: "[PATCH] The BKL is not necessary in cpuid_openMost of the variables are local to the function. It IS possible that forstruct cpuinfo_x86 *cc could point to the same area. However, this is used read only."
Previous message: Michael Guntsche: "[BUG] No ttyS0 - Strange udev 8250_pnp interaction"
In reply to: Johannes Berg: "Re: linux-next: Tree for October 7 (libertas build failure)"
Next in thread: John W. Linville: "[PATCH] wireless: make WEXT_SPY and WEXT_PRIV select WEXT_CORE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:35:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20091006:

net/wireless/wext-priv.c:206: error: implicit declaration of function 'call_commit_handler'
make[3]: *** [net/wireless/wext-priv.o] Error 1

config attached.

---
~Randy

Attachment: config-r2606
Description: Binary data

Next message: John Kacur: "[PATCH] The BKL is not necessary in cpuid_openMost of the variables are local to the function. It IS possible that forstruct cpuinfo_x86 *cc could point to the same area. However, this is used read only."
Previous message: Michael Guntsche: "[BUG] No ttyS0 - Strange udev 8250_pnp interaction"
In reply to: Johannes Berg: "Re: linux-next: Tree for October 7 (libertas build failure)"
Next in thread: John W. Linville: "[PATCH] wireless: make WEXT_SPY and WEXT_PRIV select WEXT_CORE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]