Re: [PATCH] trivial: fix checking socket() in net tstamp example

[Patrick Ohly]

On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 15:59 +0000, Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../networking/timestamping/timestamping.c         |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/timestamping/timestamping.c b/Documentation/networking/timestamping/timestamping.c
> index a7936fe..bab619a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/timestamping/timestamping.c
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/timestamping/timestamping.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	}
>  
>  	sock = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP);
> -	if (socket < 0)
> +	if (sock < 0)

Argh, of course you are right. FWIW, acknowledged.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/