Re: [PATCH] ptrace: copy_process() should disable stepping
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Nov 09 2009 - 11:29:42 EST
On 11/08, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> That is inappropriate use of arch details in generic code. It might
> happen to be harmless fritter in practice on the arch's we have but it
> is certainly not the correct way to go about things. You should just
> call user_disable_single_step() unconditionally. Even on an arch with
> no such machinery at all that should be defined safely as a no-op (see
> linux/ptrace.h). If there is some reason not to do that, please
> explain it.
Yes, we have arch_has_single_step.
I added test_tsk_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP) check for 2 reasons: to
optimize out user_disable_single_step() in the likely case, and because
I wasn't sure it is safe to call user_disable_single_step() unconditionally.
OK, will resend, thanks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/