Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode

[Willy Tarreau]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > *THIS* is the kind of complexity that makes me think that having a 
> > single source for all interpretation done in the kernel is the 
> > preferred option.
> 
> Definitely agreed ... The NX code is quite a maze right now, so changes 
> to it should come generously laced with cleanups.

BTW, I don't see why we should be impacted by NX. Trying to
execute from an NX page would return a SEGV, not SIGILL, so
we should not be bothered, am I wrong ?

Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/