Re: linux-next: sysctl tree build failure

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Eric,

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:11:34 -0800 ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> Any clue how all_noconfig happened to have CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL set?

CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL defaults to y and only depends on
CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL which also defaults to y and depends on CONFIG_PROC_FS
which also defaults to y.  All three are only selectable if
CONFIG_EMBEDDED is y (which it obviously isn't).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature