Re: linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi/processor.h)

[Randy Dunlap]

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20091111:
> 
> The cpufreq tree gained a conflict against the acpi tree.

when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n:

arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.o: In function `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit':
(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit'
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here


The function definition in include/apci/procssor.h needs to be "static inline"
at line 323.

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/