Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp

[David Wagner]

Casey Schaufler  wrote:
> I strongly suggest that this is not what is wanted.
>     strcmp(x,y)
> and
>     strncmp(x,y,sizeof(y))
>
> are functionally equivalent and strcmp has a bad reputation in
> the security community because it is associated with potential
> buffer overrun issues.

It does?  Hmm, I don't recall hearing of this bad reputation for strcmp().
Is there a justification for why such a reputation would be deserved?
We're not talking strcpy() here.  strcmp() is fine as long as its
arguments are properly '\0'-terminated; given that, it doesn't introduce
any new buffer overrun risks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/