Re: [PATCH 1/5] page allocator: Always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Fri Nov 13 2009 - 00:23:35 EST


> If a direct reclaim makes no forward progress, it considers whether it
> should go OOM or not. Whether OOM is triggered or not, it may retry the
> application afterwards. In times past, this would always wake kswapd as well
> but currently, kswapd is not woken up after direct reclaim fails. For order-0
> allocations, this makes little difference but if there is a heavy mix of
> higher-order allocations that direct reclaim is failing for, it might mean
> that kswapd is not rewoken for higher orders as much as it did previously.
>
> This patch wakes up kswapd when an allocation is being retried after a direct
> reclaim failure. It would be expected that kswapd is already awake, but
> this has the effect of telling kswapd to reclaim at the higher order as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Umm,
My mail box have the carbon copy of akpm sent this patch to linus.
(bellow subject and data)

Does this have any update?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [patch 07/35] page allocator: always wake kswapd when restarting an allocation attempt after direct reclaim failed
To: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mel@xxxxxxxxx,
cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
stable@xxxxxxxxxx
From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:26:14 -0800



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/