Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning

[Felipe Contreras]

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 22:28 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that
>> somebody will pick it up.
>
> I'd re-submit with a better description of the patch. You should always
> try to describe what your doing as accurately as possible so the
> maintainer doesn't have to work very hard to know what your doing.

There's nothing to add. It's a patch to cleanup the coding style, that's it.

> That
> particular patch just has a one liner description that wasn't very
> informative .. Either that or re-submit your series without that patch
> if you don't have confidence in it.

All of my patches have been picked up, except the ones for ACPI. I
haven't received a single comment from them, which would explain the
current state of the code.

If somebody raised the hand and said; I'll merge this, please resend,
I'd do that, otherwise I think it's a waste of time.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/