Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool

[Pekka Enberg]

Ingo Molnar kirjoitti:
> Regarding patch 2 - can we set some definitive benchmark threshold for 
> that? I.e. a list of must-have features in 'perf kmem' before we can do 
> it? 100% information and analysis equivalency with kmemtrace-user tool? 

I'd be interested to hear Eduard's comment on that.

That said, I'll try to find some time to test "perf kmem" and provide 
feedback on that. I can ACK the patch when I'm happy with the output. :-)

I'm mostly interested in two scenarios: (1) getting a nice report on 
worst fragmented call-sites (perf kmem needs symbol lookup) and (2) 
doing "perf kmem record" on machine A (think embedded here) and then 
"perf kmem report" on machine B. I haven't tried kmemtrace-user for a 
while but it did support both of them quite nicely at some point.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/