Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] Maintain preemptability count even for!CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Mon Nov 23 2009 - 12:30:57 EST

Next message: K.Prasad: "Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: Add support for breakpoint events inperf tools"
Previous message: Mauro Carvalho Chehab: "Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was:Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure"
In reply to: Gleb Natapov: "Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] Maintain preemptability count even for!CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels"
Next in thread: Gleb Natapov: "[PATCH v2 11/12] Handle async PF in non preemptable context."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This adds significant overhead for the !PREEMPT case adding lots of code
in critical paths all over the place.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: K.Prasad: "Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf tools: Add support for breakpoint events inperf tools"
Previous message: Mauro Carvalho Chehab: "Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was:Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure"
In reply to: Gleb Natapov: "Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] Maintain preemptability count even for!CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels"
Next in thread: Gleb Natapov: "[PATCH v2 11/12] Handle async PF in non preemptable context."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]