Re: [patch] sched: fix b5d9d734 blunder in task_new_fair()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Nov 24 2009 - 12:54:54 EST
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 18:35 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 18:07 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > if (p->sched_class->task_new) {
> > > /* can detect migration through: task_cpu(p) != smp_processor_id() */
> >
> > What if the parent was migrated before we got here?
>
> Well, the only case it really matters for is the child_runs_first crap,
> which is basically broken on SMP anyway, so I don't think we care too
> much if we race here.
>
> Unless I missed some detail that is ;-)
Also, we're running all this from the parent context, and we have
preemption disabled, we're not going anywhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/