Re: linux-next: i7core_edac tree build failure

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Mauro,

On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:30:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:54:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, the i7core_edac fix needs to stay in my tree as it is an
> > interaction between two trees in linux-next.  The others should be
> > applied to the powerpc and sparc trees, as you say, since they fix the
> > current code in those trees.
> 
> Actually, Mauro, this patch should be applied to the i7core_edac as that
> symbol never needed to be exported and the patch to export it is in that
> tree.

Is there any reason that this patch (copied below) cannot be applied to
the i7core_edac tree?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:55:38 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] i7core_edac: do not export static functions

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/pci/legacy.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c b/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
index 5e22d83..a8194c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ static int __init pci_legacy_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_legacy_init);
 
 void pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn)
 {
-- 
1.6.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/