ceph code review

[Sage Weil]

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> The code looks reasonable to me.  Unless others emit convincing
> squeaks, please ask Stephen to include your git tree into linux-next
> sometime within the next month, then send Linus a pull request for
> 2.6.33.

The code has seen 70 odd patches since then.  Mostly small fixes and 
cleanups, and a handful of larger changes.  Should these see the light of 
LKML before I send a pull request of Linus?  (So far they've just gone out 
to the ceph commit list.) I don't want to spam everyone with a huge series 
fixing up as yet unmerged code, but I'm not sure that review on the ceph 
lists is sufficient, given the frequency with which I see fs series on 
LKML...

What are the best practices here?

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/