* Masami Hiramatsu<mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Masami Hiramatsu<mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add signal coredump tracepoint which shows signal number, mm->flags,
limits, pointer to file structure and core file name.
Why is the kernel pointer to the file structure logged? User-space has
no use for it and the analysis value is low.
Ah, if open() or opening pipe fails, it becomes 0 or -ERRNO, so we can
check if there is an error.
ok, that wasnt obvious from the patch - worth adding it to the
changelog.
Perhaps, we can do below in trace_printk for trace users.
"open %s", (!file || IS_ERR((void *)file)) ? "failed" : "succeeded"
i'd rather suggest to pass an error code (and keep it 0 if none),
instead of some ad-hoc string message.
But ... the whole issue of VFS event logging and new tracepoints should
be approached from a more generic direction i think. Do we want to log
inode_nr:dev pairs as well? Shouldnt there be a generic event-class
definition via DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS for file related events, with 'core
dumped' just being a sub-event-code?
I sense reluctance from the direction of Andrew and disinterest from the
VFS folks - not a good backdrop in general.
Ingo