Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33

[Alan Stern]

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> However, the parent can be on a different bus type than the children, so it
> looks like we can only start the asynchronous path at the core level.

Agreed.

> > Unless you want to do _all_ of the async logic in generic code and 
> > re-introduce the "dev->async_suspend" flag.
> 
> Quite frankly, I would like to.
> 
> > I would be ok with that now that the infrastructure seems so simple.
> 
> Well, perhaps I should dig out my original async suspend/resume patches
> that didn't contain all of the non-essential stuff and post them here for
> discussion, after all ...

That seems like a very good idea.  IIRC they were quite similar to what 
we have been discussing.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/