Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Sun Dec 20 2009 - 10:14:55 EST
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 13:10 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> and as for CFS, it SHOULD exhibit fair behavior anyway, isnt it called
> "completely FAIR scheduler" ? or is that just the marketing name?
Clue: CFS _did_ distribute CPU evenly. Ponder that for a moment.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/