Re: [PATCH] libata: pata_bf54x: handle portmuxing of pins through GPIO PORTs

[Jeff Garzik]

On 12/21/2009 09:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 14:07, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > By default, the PATA pins are routed to the async address lines in which
> > > case, no peripheral muxing needs to be done.  However, if the pins get
> > > routed through the GPIO PORTs pins, we need to make sure to request them
> > > so that the muxing is properly set up.
> > > ---
> > > Andrew: could you pick this up ?  it was posted over a month ago to the
> > > Linux/IDE list w/no feedback.
> >
> > Although it is disappointing that your patch was missed -- our apologies --
> > I don't think the best response was to elide linux-ide and the libata
> > maintainer, in favor of a higher noise list.  :)
> >
> > I have the patch queued, now.
>
> so it's been 8 months since it was posted, 6 months since it was
> queued, and multiple libata merges have been made, but this patch has
> yet to make it into mainline ...

No idea how it got lost :(   Just sent a pull request to Linus with this 
in it.

	Jeff




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/