Re: [PATCH 05/37] kdb: core for kgdb back end

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Dec 24 2009 - 06:05:28 EST


On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:19 -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 87f1f47..6e1cfcf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -9785,7 +9785,7 @@ void normalize_rt_tasks(void)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IA64
> +#if defined(CONFIG_IA64) || defined(CONFIG_KGDB_KDB)
> /*
> * These functions are only useful for the IA64 MCA handling.
> *
> @@ -10912,6 +10912,97 @@ struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys = {
> };
> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_KDB
> +#include <linux/kdb.h>
> +
> +static void
> +kdb_prio(char *name, struct rt_prio_array *array, kdb_printf_t xxx_printf,
> + unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + int pri, printed_header = 0;
> + struct task_struct *p;
> +
> + xxx_printf(" %s rt bitmap: 0x%lx 0x%lx 0x%lx\n",
> + name,
> + array->bitmap[0], array->bitmap[1], array->bitmap[2]);
> +
> + pri = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
> + if (pri < MAX_RT_PRIO) {
> + xxx_printf(" rt bitmap priorities:");
> + while (pri < MAX_RT_PRIO) {
> + xxx_printf(" %d", pri);
> + pri++;
> + pri = find_next_bit(array->bitmap, MAX_RT_PRIO, pri);
> + }
> + xxx_printf("\n");
> + }
> +
> + for (pri = 0; pri < MAX_RT_PRIO; pri++) {
> + int printed_hdr = 0;
> + struct list_head *head, *curr;
> +
> + head = array->queue + pri;
> + curr = head->next;
> + while (curr != head) {
> + struct task_struct *task;
> + if (!printed_hdr) {
> + xxx_printf(" queue at priority=%d\n", pri);
> + printed_hdr = 1;
> + }
> + task = list_entry(curr, struct task_struct,
> + rt.run_list);
> + if (task)
> + xxx_printf(" 0x%p %d %s time_slice:%d\n",
> + task, task->pid, task->comm,
> + task->rt.time_slice);
> + curr = curr->next;
> + }
> + }
> + for_each_process(p) {
> + if (p->se.on_rq && (task_cpu(p) == cpu) &&
> + (p->policy == SCHED_NORMAL)) {
> + if (!printed_header) {
> + xxx_printf(" sched_normal queue:\n");
> + printed_header = 1;
> + }
> + xxx_printf(" 0x%p %d %s pri:%d spri:%d npri:%d\n",
> + p, p->pid, p->comm, p->prio,
> + p->static_prio, p->normal_prio);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* This code must be in sched.c because struct rq is only defined in this
> + * source. To allow most of kdb to be modular, this code cannot call any kdb
> + * functions directly, any external functions that it needs must be passed in
> + * as parameters.
> + */

Wrong comment style.

> +void
> +kdb_runqueue(unsigned long cpu, kdb_printf_t xxx_printf)
> +{
> + struct rq *rq;
> +
> + rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> +
> + xxx_printf("CPU%ld lock:%s curr:0x%p(%d)(%s)",
> + cpu, (raw_spin_is_locked(&rq->lock)) ? "LOCKED" : "free",
> + rq->curr, rq->curr->pid, rq->curr->comm);
> + if (rq->curr == rq->idle)
> + xxx_printf(" is idle");
> + xxx_printf("\n ");
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + xxx_printf(" cpu_load:%lu %lu %lu",
> + rq->cpu_load[0], rq->cpu_load[1], rq->cpu_load[2]);
> +#endif
> + xxx_printf(" nr_running:%lu nr_switches:%llu\n",
> + rq->nr_running, (long long)rq->nr_switches);
> + kdb_prio("active", &rq->rt.active, xxx_printf, (unsigned int)cpu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kdb_runqueue);
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KGDB_KDB */
> +

So what is this code supposed to do? It looks like it simply cannot be
correct.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/