Re: [PATCH 1/3] Security: Add disablenetwork interface. (v4)

From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Mon Dec 28 2009 - 14:28:30 EST


Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Quoting Michael Stone (michael@xxxxxxxxxx):
> > Daniel Bernstein has observed [1] that security-conscious userland processes
> > may benefit from the ability to irrevocably remove their ability to create,
> > bind, connect to, or send messages except in the case of previously connected
> > sockets or AF_UNIX filesystem sockets.
> >
> > This patch provides
> >
> > * a new configuration option named CONFIG_SECURITY_DISABLENETWORK,
> > * a new prctl option-pair (PR_SET_NETWORK, PR_GET_NETWORK),
> > * a new prctl(PR_SET_NETWORK) flag named PR_NETWORK_OFF, and
> > * a new task_struct flags field named "network"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Stone <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/prctl.h | 7 +++++
> > include/linux/prctl_network.h | 7 +++++
> > include/linux/sched.h | 4 +++
> > kernel/sys.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > security/Kconfig | 11 ++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/prctl_network.h
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/prctl.h b/include/linux/prctl.h
> > index a3baeb2..4eb4110 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/prctl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/prctl.h
> > @@ -102,4 +102,11 @@
> >
> > #define PR_MCE_KILL_GET 34
> >
> > +/* Get/set process disable-network flags */
> > +#define PR_SET_NETWORK 35
> > +#define PR_GET_NETWORK 36
> > +# define PR_NETWORK_ON 0
> > +# define PR_NETWORK_OFF 1
> > +# define PR_NETWORK_ALL_FLAGS 1
> > +
> > #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/prctl_network.h b/include/linux/prctl_network.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d18f8cb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/prctl_network.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_PRCTL_NETWORK_H
> > +#define _LINUX_PRCTL_NETWORK_H
> > +
> > +extern long prctl_get_network(unsigned long*);
> > +extern long prctl_set_network(unsigned long*);
> > +
> > +#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_NETWORK_H */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index f2f842d..6fcaef8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1403,6 +1403,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> > #endif
> > seccomp_t seccomp;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_DISABLENETWORK
> > + unsigned long network;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /* Thread group tracking */
> > u32 parent_exec_id;
> > u32 self_exec_id;
> > diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
> > index 26a6b73..b48f021 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sys.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> > #include <linux/fs_struct.h>
> > +#include <linux/prctl_network.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/compat.h>
> > #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > @@ -1578,6 +1579,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3,
> > else
> > error = PR_MCE_KILL_DEFAULT;
> > break;
> > + case PR_SET_NETWORK:
> > + error = prctl_set_network((unsigned long*)arg2);
> > + break;
> > + case PR_GET_NETWORK:
> > + error = prctl_get_network((unsigned long*)arg2);
> > + break;
>
> Is there any reason not to handle these in
> disablenetwork_security_prctl()
> ?
>
> Other than that, this looks quite good to me... (No need to
> initialize ret=0 in your security_* updates, to get pedantic,
> that's all I noticed)
>
> I'll give it a closer look on monday before I ack.

But I'm going to wait to see a response (or new patch) about moving
this code to disablenetwork_security_prctl().

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/