Pekka Enberg wrote:On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:00 AM, <re.emese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@xxxxxxxxx>CC mm/slub.o
Signed-off-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 4996fc7..fb63aca 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4522,7 +4522,7 @@ static int uevent_filter(struct kset *kset, struct kobject *kobj)
return 0;
}
-static struct kset_uevent_ops slab_uevent_ops = {
+static const struct kset_uevent_ops slab_uevent_ops = {
.filter = uevent_filter,
};
mm/slub.c: In function 'slab_sysfs_init':
mm/slub.c:4679: warning: passing argument 2 of 'kset_create_and_add'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
include/linux/kobject.h:164: note: expected 'struct kset_uevent_ops *'
but argument is of type 'const struct kset_uevent_ops *'
Hmm?
I double checked both the declaration and definitions of the affected
function/structure and they are consistently const here.
Can you tell me what patch/tree combination you encountered this warning with?