Re: what's the purpose of MAXHOSTNAMELEN?

[Jeff Garzik]

On 12/29/2009 02:56 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jeff Garzik, le Tue 29 Dec 2009 14:40:05 -0500, a écrit :
> > On 12/29/2009 02:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/param.h:#define MAXHOSTNAMELEN	64	/* max
> > > length of hostname */
> > >
> > >    so lots of people define it but no one uses it.  it *is* exported to
> > > user space in /usr/include/asm/param.h, but i still have no idea what
> > > it's for in user space.  obsolete?
> >
> > According to RFC 1034, "Each node has a label, which is zero to 63
> > octets in length"
>
> That's for Internet networks.  Other kinds of networks could implement
> more.  It could make sense to restrict ourself to Internet standards,
> but we don't :)

Er huh?  That was a description of the origin of the limit.

And as a point of fact, we do restrict ourself to that:

	#define __NEW_UTS_LEN 64

	struct new_utsname {
	        char sysname[__NEW_UTS_LEN + 1];
	        char nodename[__NEW_UTS_LEN + 1];



> > What is it used for in userspace, and why is it export from the kernel?
>
> Gethostname, typically, but also all kinds of functions that provide a
> hostname.  It's also quite often completely badly used, for instance for
> getnameinfo()...
>
> You have Debian's list on
> http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/hurd-i386_Failed.html

No one cares about Hurd.

	Jeff




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/