Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] memcg: implement memory thresholds

From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Wed Dec 30 2009 - 08:03:35 EST


On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Daisuke Nishimura
<nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It would be a nitpick, but my patch(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=126152804420992&w=2)
> has already modified here.
>
> I think it might be better for you to apply my patches by hand or wait for next mmotm
> to be released to avoid bothering Andrew.
> (There is enough time left till the next merge window :))

I'll rebase it later.

> (snip)
>
>> +static void __mem_cgroup_threshold(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)
>> +{
>> + Â Â struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary *thresholds;
>> + Â Â u64 usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, swap);
>> + Â Â int i, cur;
>> +
> I think calling mem_cgroup_usage() after checking "if(!thresholds)"
> decreases the overhead a little when we don't set any thresholds.
> I've confirmed that the change makes the assembler output different.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/