Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Improve hash function used for full_name_hash()
From: David Miller
Date: Mon Jan 04 2010 - 15:47:28 EST
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:29:12 -0800
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:09:44 -0800
> Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> For example, when hashing "eth0" .. "eth9999" with a hash table size of 256,
>> the resulting minimum hash bucket depth is 0, the maximum depth is 563,
>> and the standard deviation is ~136.
>
> The problem was a missing call to hash_32() on the result, and is
> already fixed in current kernel.
Added linux-kernel CC: to followup...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/