Re: [PATCH 1/5] irq: remove not need bootmem code

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Fri Jan 08 2010 - 13:52:33 EST

Next message: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need read queuemerging"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] Makefile: do not override LC_CTYPE"
In reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array"
Next in thread: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH 1/5] irq: remove not need bootmem code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

YH overall this looks like a good patch series, that enables
additional cleanups beyond what it does. Thank you for putting this
together.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Vivek Goyal: "Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need read queuemerging"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: [PATCH] Makefile: do not override LC_CTYPE"
In reply to: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array"
Next in thread: Yinghai Lu: "[PATCH 1/5] irq: remove not need bootmem code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]