Re: trouble compiling dwalker's for-next tree

From: Daniel Walker
Date: Sun Jan 10 2010 - 10:22:11 EST


On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is great to have all changes merged, but I ran into some trouble:
>
> 1) mmc.h was missing.
>
> 2) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c: In function 'msm_chg_rpc_connect':
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7201a_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:156: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_msm7x27_surf'
> arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.c:157: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'machine_is_qsd8x50_surf'
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/rpc_hsusb.o] Error 1
>
> (I provided missing inlines)
>
> 3) CC arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.o
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:31:35: error: linux/remote_spinlock.h:
> No such file or directory
> arch/arm/mach-msm/acpuclock.c:106: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
> 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'pll_lock'
>

It's still really really un-cooked .. There's tons of compile failures
that still need to be cleanup .. Most of the targets aren't going to
compile without tuning the config some..

What config are you using? I can try to correct some of the compile
failure ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/