Re: [PATCH 01/24] MAINTAINERS: Document new "Q:" patchwork queuetype

[Stefan Richter]

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:02 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> The proposed entry type is somewhat redundant:
>> PS:  Make sure that patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are
>> mentioned in our process-related documentation, and you are done.  No
>> need for more MAINTAINERS churn just for that.
> 
> Many lists are not using patchwork.

All lists which do use patchwork are listed on patchwork.kernel.org and
patchwork.ozlabs.org.  So, add a paragraph on them in
Documentation/HOWTO and you are done.

The listings at patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are always
current.  Your manual copy in the kernel source won't be.

See?  I just saved you and others quite some time.  You could spend it
for example to helpgetting our regressions count down.

> Micropatches to MAINTAINERS are preferred because of rate of change.

Useless micropatches do _not_ make one look productive.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/