Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)

[Avi Kivity]

On 01/15/2010 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> As previously stated, I think poking at a process's address space is an
> utter no-go.
>    

Why not reserve an address space range for this, somewhere near the top 
of memory?  It doesn't have to be populated if it isn't used.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/