Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Sun Jan 17 2010 - 09:40:50 EST

On 01/15/2010 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
As previously stated, I think poking at a process's address space is an
utter no-go.

Why not reserve an address space range for this, somewhere near the top of memory? It doesn't have to be populated if it isn't used.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at