Re: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling (v5)
From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Mon Jan 18 2010 - 11:22:22 EST
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 15:53 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Not sure what you both mean by this core VS uncore thing :)
> > Is it about hardware counters that apply to single hardware threads
> > or shared among them inside a same core?
> Yeah intel has two PMUs, one per logical cpu and one per socket/node. We
> currently don't support the node one yet.
> So the thing with these socket wide things is is that they are not able
> to tell where the event originated, so relating that back to a task is
> only possible when there's only one task running.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/