Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
From: Jim Keniston
Date: Mon Jan 18 2010 - 14:21:46 EST
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 10:58 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Jim Keniston wrote:
> > Not really. For #3 (boosting), you need to know everything for #2,
> > plus be able to compute the length of each instruction -- which we can
> > now do for x86. To emulate an instruction (#4), you need to replicate
> > what it does, side-effects and all. The x86 instruction set seems to
> > be adding new floating-point instructions all the time, and I bet even
> > Masami doesn't know what they all do, but so far, they all seem to
> > adhere to the instruction-length rules encoded in Masami's instruction
> > decoder.
> Actually, current x86 decoder doesn't support FP(x87) instructions.(even
> it already supported AVX) But I think it's not so hard to add it.
At one point I verified that it worked for all the x87 instructions in
I'm pretty sure I tested mmx instructions as well. But I guess this was
before you rearranged the opcode tables.
Yeah, it wouldn't be hard to add back in, at least for purposes of
computing instruction lengths.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/