Re: [PATCH 04/40] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Jan 19 2010 - 03:37:55 EST
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:07 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> It's also necessary to guarantee forward progress during CPU_DOWN.
> The problem with kthread_bind() is that it's not synchronized against
> CPU hotplug operations. It needs outer synchronization like calling
> it directly from CPU_DOWN_PREP. I guess it's doable but I think it
> would be better to simply share the backend implementation between
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() and kthread_bind().
OK, so you're saying you need to migrate the rescue thread during
cpu-down. That thread is guaranteed sleeping right, if it were not it'd
not be elegible to run on our dying cpu. Hence kthread_bind() ought to
just work, no?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/