Re: [PATCH 06/40] sched: add wakeup/sleep sched_notifiers and allowNULL notifier ops
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Jan 19 2010 - 03:47:17 EST
On 01/19/2010 10:04 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> I'm thinking that we can place it next to activate_task(), if it makes
>> you feel better you can place them both at the end up ttwu_activate()
>> instead of in the middle.
>> Esp. with the callback you have it really doesn't matter.
> Alright, if it's safe, there's no reason to keep it separate with an
> extra branch. I'll move it.
Alright, was trying to convert it and I'm still a bit worried. One of
the reasons I put it at the end of post_activation() is to allow
calling try_to_wake_up_local() from wakeup callback. This won't be
used by cmwq right now but making it symmetrical to sleep callback
would be more consistent, so... If we fire wakeup callback right
after activate_task() and allow try_to_wake_up_local() to be called
from it, wake up logic ends up being nested inside outer wake up which
is still in progress. Would that be safe too?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/