Re: [Update][RFC][PATCH] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disablingdevice run-time PM

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Ouch.  This does nearly the same thing as the power/level attribute in
> > the USB subsystem, but in an incompatible and more complicated way.
> > 
> > The power/level attribute can contain either "on" or "auto", meaning
> > that the device is always on or that it is subject to automatic runtime
> > power management (autosuspend).
> 
> It looks like my "disable" is similar to "on", while my "enable" is similar to
> "auto".  I can use "auto" and "on" just fine.

Good.

> > Changing the setting from "auto" to "on" merely does sets a flag and does
> > pm_runtime_get_sync(); changing it from "on" to "auto" clears the flag and
> > does pm_runtime_put_sync().
> 
> We can do it almost this way in general, although I think the flag should be
> changed under the power.lock.

Yes.  I was using the device semaphore, but the power.lock is more 
appropriate here.

> Updated patch is appended.

Why change the name from "level" to "runtime"?

>  /*
> + *	runtime - Report/change current runtime PM setting of the device
> + *
> + *	Runtime power management of a device can be blocked with the help of
> + *	this attribute.  All devices have one of the following two values for
> + *	the power/runtime file:
> + *
> + *	 + "auto\n" to allow the device to be power managed at run time;
> + *	 + "on\n" to prevent the device from being power managemed at run time;

---------------------------------------------------------------^^  typo

Don't forget to add an entry to Documentation/ABI/testing/.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/