Re: [RFC] [PATCH] watchdog_info separation and constify

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Tue Jan 19 2010 - 16:52:49 EST

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 16:42, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:17 +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
>> -static struct watchdog_info at32_wdt_info = {
>> +static const struct watchdog_info at32_wdt_info = {
> It'd be good to use a consistent structure name:
> static const struct watchdog_info ident = {
> Â Â Â Âetc...
> }

i'd agree (obviously i'm partial to the "xxx_wdt_info" form), but i'd
worry about this after the watchdog implementations are finally
unified ... might be less code needing standardization at that point
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at