Re: [PATCH 32/40] async: introduce workqueue based alternative implementation
From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Tue Jan 19 2010 - 19:31:16 EST
On 1/19/2010 16:19, Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, you can flush individual works from other works and wqs from
works running from different wqs. What's not allowed is flushing the
wq a work is running on from the work. Let's say if the flush code
can be modified to do so, would that change your opinion?
once you get "run in parallel, but have an API to wait on everyone who was scheduled before me"...
... that'd be fine ;)
but then you pretty much HAVE the cookie API, even if you don't have an actual cookie.
(just the cookie was an easy way to determine the "before me")
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/