Re: [patch 2/2] sata_via: Delay on vt6420 when starting ATAPI DMA write

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Jan 20 2010 - 01:49:14 EST


On 01/20/2010 03:44 PM, Bart Hartgers wrote:
> Yes, you're right. I'll drop the printk_once and send another patch
> for inclusion. However, for testing I found it very useful to make
> sure that I got the right module loaded. So I figured it could be
> helpful for the interpretation of success/failure reports.

Oh yeah, for testing, having it there is a good idea.

> Assuming that this patch works for other people as well, what is
> prefered: resending both patches or just to make a new #2/2 (the
> vt6420 one)?

I think just re-doing the second patch should be enough.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at