Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 20:58 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when
> a thread is deboosted. The following patch series adresses this.
> 
> Thanks and Kudos go to Mathias Weber and Carsten Emde for analysis,
> test cases and initial workaround patches.

These look fine to me,

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/