Re: [PATCH 5/8] vmalloc: simplify vread()/vwrite()
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Thu Jan 21 2010 - 00:24:50 EST
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:05:21 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:23:43PM -0700, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:33:03 +0800
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > The whole thing looks stupid though, apparently kmap is used to avoid "the
> > > > lock". But the lock is already held. We should just use the vmap
> > > > address.
> > >
> > > Yes. I wonder why Kame introduced kmap_atomic() in d0107eb07 -- given
> > > that he at the same time fixed the order of removing vm_struct and
> > > vmap in dd32c279983b.
> > >
> > Hmm...I must check my thinking again before answering..
> > vmalloc/vmap is constructed by 2 layer.
> > - vmalloc layer....guarded by vmlist_lock.
> > - vmap layer ....gurderd by purge_lock. etc.
> > Now, let's see how vmalloc() works. It does job in 2 steps.
> > vmalloc():
> > - allocate vmalloc area to the list under vmlist_lock.
> > - map pages.
> > vfree()
> > - free vmalloc area from the list under vmlist_lock.
> > - unmap pages under purge_lock.
> > Now. vread(), vwrite() just take vmlist_lock, doesn't take purge_lock().
> > It walks page table and find pte entry, page, kmap and access it.
> > Oh, yes. It seems it's safe without kmap. But My concern is percpu allocator.
> > It uses get_vm_area() and controls mapped pages by themselves and
> > map/unmap pages by with their own logic. vmalloc.c is just used for
> > alloc/free virtual address.
> > Now, vread()/vwrite() just holds vmlist_lock() and walk page table
> > without no guarantee that the found page is stably mapped. So, I used kmap.
> > If I miss something, I'm very sorry to add such kmap.
> Ah Thanks for explanation!
> I did some audit and find that
> - set_memory_uc(), set_memory_array_uc(), set_pages_uc(),
> set_pages_array_uc() are called EFI code and various video drivers,
> all of them don't touch HIGHMEM RAM
> - Kame: ioremap() won't allow remap of physical RAM
> So kmap_atomic() is safe. Let's just settle on this patch?
I recommend you to keep check on VM_IOREMAP. That was checked far before
I started to see Linux. Some _unknown_ driver can call get_vm_area() and
map arbitrary pages there.
I'm sorry I coundn't track discussion correctly.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/