Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations

[David Miller]

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:36:17 -0500

> [ Added Heiko Carstens and Paul Mundt to Cc ]
> 
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> also, does the arch_syscall_addr() even really need to be weak ?  or can
>> we assume that everyone is going to be sane and do it the same way ...
>> 
>>  Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt |    6 +++++-
>>  arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c             |   10 ----------
>>  arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c               |    9 ---------
>>  arch/sparc/kernel/ftrace.c            |   11 -----------
>>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c              |   10 ----------
>>  include/linux/ftrace.h                |    6 ++++++
>>  kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c         |    6 +++++
> 
> Actually for this patch to be accepted, we need to get the acks from the
> maintainers of s390, sh, and sparc since it touches their code. Doesn't
> matter if it is just removing duplicate code. Still need their acks.

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/