Re: [stable] [00/29] stable review

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sun Jan 24 2010 - 11:35:29 EST

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the release.
> > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> will still contain the regression described in (for example)
> It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in
> -mm) for ten days.
> I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's
> otherwise engaged. There's a fix in the lkml thread "Re: [RFC PATCH
> 0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu
> hotplug" to which Thomas replied
> I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check. This
> is the least intrusive solution for now. The logic needs an
> overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material"

Just sent the pull request for it. Sorry for the delay. The patch
needs to go into 32.6 as well.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at