Re: [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 stable review

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.6 release.
> > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
> > this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
> > us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
> > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> 2.6.32.6 will still contain the regression described in (for example)
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
> 
> It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in
> -mm) for ten days.
> 
> I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's
> otherwise engaged.  There's a fix in the lkml thread "Re: [RFC PATCH
> 0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu
> hotplug" to which Thomas replied
> 
>     I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check.  This
>     is the least intrusive solution for now.  The logic needs an
>     overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material"

Just sent the pull request for it. Sorry for the delay. The patch
needs to go into 32.6 as well.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/