Re: [PATCH 4/6] tracing: Change trace_seq to use separate buffer
From: Lai Jiangshan
Date: Mon Jan 25 2010 - 22:26:33 EST
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:34:16PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> @@ -3124,6 +3126,8 @@ waitagain:
>> if (cnt >= PAGE_SIZE)
>> cnt = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
>> + trace_seq_reset(&iter->seq);
> So we actually add a trace_seq_reset here.
> This should have been in the first patch, which drops
> the memset, and eventually modified here, just to avoid
> breaking things in the middle of a patchset.
> Things were already broken though before the memset dropping
> patch though in other ways, so it's not that important I guess...
There is no trace_seq_reset() before this patch applied.
trace_seq_init() in the first patch, has already reset it.
Things are not broken by the first patch, if I did not misunderstand.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/