Re: linux-next:als tree build failure
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu Jan 28 2010 - 07:27:57 EST
Hi Jonathan, Jean,
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:59:37 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It does make sense to keep these two steps separate. Ah well, I guess any
> work around would be a pretty terrible cludge. I'll roll these two patches
> back together and otherwise we will end up with something even less coherent.
OK, thanks guys.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature