Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was:Re: [linux-pm] Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Sat Jan 30 2010 - 15:38:01 EST
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 19:47 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 30 January 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 01:38 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I thing the snippet below is a good summary of what this is about.
> > Any progress on that?
> Well, I'm waiting for you to report back:
> The patch is appended once again for convenience.
I used the second version (with the locks) and it works for sure (~500
However, as I discovered today, it takes the lock also for GFP_ATOMIC,
and thats why I see several backtraces in the kernel log. Anyway this
I forgot all about this patch, and I am compiling the kernel right away.
Will put the kernel through the hibernate loop tonight.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/