Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] ftrace: Release the function hlist if wedon't need it anymore

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Sat Jan 30 2010 - 16:14:56 EST


On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:41:59PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > After we disable the function profiler, the function hashlist
> > stays in memory. This is wasteful as nobody needs it anymore,
> > until the next use if any.
> >
> > Release it when we disable the function profiler instead of
> > resetting it in the next use.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 1 +
> > kernel/trace/functions_hlist.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > kernel/trace/functions_hlist.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > index dfd8f7c..0ded01c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> > @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ ftrace_profile_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>
> > /*
> > * unregister_ftrace_profiler calls stop_machine
> > * so this acts like an synchronize_sched.
> > */
> > unregister_ftrace_profiler();
>
> unluckily, when !CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE, it does not call stop_machine()
> nor synchronize_sched(), bug here?



Yeah. I guess the synchronize_sched() is here to ensure
that if a user reenables the profiler, there is no
pending tracing callback that touches the hlist
that can become reset.

We indeed may need an explicit synchronize_sched() for
!CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/