[PATCH 0/3] Was: x86: get rid of the insane TIF_ABI_PENDING bit

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 02/16, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:19:03AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Agreed, but otoh it is always good to understand the code. If we
> > really have a reason for TS_COMPAT, a small comment can help other
> > readers.
>
> My memory is somewhat fuzzy on this one, but I think it was related
> to VMA placement (probably for stack randomization or something like that)
> This happens before the first call. I might be wrong on that.

Afaics we never check TS_COMPAT/is_compat_task for this...

> There might also have been other is_compat_task checks in the exec init
> path, so partly it was defensive programming.

Understand, but it looks so confusing...

OK. Please feel free to ignore, but I am sending the trivial, but only
compile-tested patches. My main motivation is to simplify the reading
and understanding of this code.

The first patch looks like an "obvious" bugfix for 2.6.33 though, but
still untested.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/