Re: [PATCH 2/2] dlm: Remove obsolete lockspace lookup

[David Teigland]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:41:35AM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> We don't need to look up the lockspace in this particular
> case since we already have a pointer to it (which was being
> dereferenced in order to do the lookup in the first place).

It'll take more to convince me that that reference from find isn't needed.
My assumption is that I added it because it was.

Dave

> Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/dlm/lockspace.c |    6 +-----
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c
> index 26a8bd4..ce0fdf5 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c
> @@ -37,10 +37,6 @@ static ssize_t dlm_control_store(struct dlm_ls *ls, const char *buf, size_t len)
>  	ssize_t ret = len;
>  	int n = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 0);
>  
> -	ls = dlm_find_lockspace_local(ls->ls_local_handle);
> -	if (!ls)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	switch (n) {
>  	case 0:
>  		dlm_ls_stop(ls);
> @@ -51,7 +47,7 @@ static ssize_t dlm_control_store(struct dlm_ls *ls, const char *buf, size_t len)
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -	dlm_put_lockspace(ls);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/