Re: [PATCH 35/40] fscache: convert object to use workqueue instead of slow-work
From: David Howells
Date: Thu Feb 18 2010 - 06:51:53 EST
Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The waiting workers are woken up in slow_work_enqueue() when a new
> work is enqueued regardless of how many workers are currently in use,
> right? So, it ends up yielding on any queue activity rather than only
> under resource pressure.
It depends how you define resource pressure, I suppose. There's someone now
waiting for the resource, and there's someone blocking that resource who can
yield it as they're waiting on something else. The question is if it's
cheaper to create a new thread, assuming we're under the limit, or if it's
cheaper to steal someone else's thread?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/