Re: s2disk hang update

[Alan Jenkins]

On 2/17/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>> On 2/16/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 16 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>> >> On 2/16/10, Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > On 2/15/10, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>> >> >>> Perhaps I spoke too soon.  I see the same hang if I run too many
>> >> >>> applications.  The first hibernation fails with "not enough swap"
>> >> >>> as
>> >> >>> expected, but the second or third attempt hangs (with the same
>> >> >>> backtrace
>> >> >>> as before).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The patch definitely helps though.  Without the patch, I see a hang
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> first time I try to hibernate with too many applications running.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well, I have an idea.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can you try to apply the appended patch in addition and see if that
>> >> >> helps?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Rafael
>> >> >
>> >> > It doesn't seem to help.
>> >>
>> >> To be clear: It doesn't stop the hang when I hibernate with too many
>> >> applications.
>> >>
>> >> It does stop the same hang in a different case though.
>> >>
>> >> 1. boot with init=/bin/bash
>> >> 2. run s2disk
>> >> 3. cancel the s2disk
>> >> 4. repeat steps 2&3
>> >>
>> >> With the patch, I can run 10s of iterations, with no hang.
>> >> Without the patch, it soon hangs, (in disable_nonboot_cpus(), as
>> >> always).
>> >>
>> >> That's what happens on 2.6.33-rc7.  On 2.6.30, there is no problem.
>> >> On 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 I don't get a hang, but dmesg shows an allocation
>> >> failure after a couple of iterations ("kthreadd: page allocation
>> >> failure. order:1, mode:0xd0").  It looks like it might be the same
>> >> stop_machine thread allocation failure that causes the hang.
>> >
>> > Have you tested it alone or on top of the previous one?  If you've
>> > tested it
>> > alone, please apply the appended one in addition to it and retest.
>> >
>> > Rafael
>>
>> I did test with both patches applied together -
>>
>> 1. [Update] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume
>> 2. "reducing the number of pages that we're going to keep preallocated by
>> 20%"
>
> In that case you can try to reduce the number of preallocated pages even
> more,
> ie. change "/ 5" to "/ 2" (for example) in the second patch.

It still hangs if I try to hibernate a couple of times with too many
applications.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/