Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw-breakpoints: Accept breakpoints on NULL address

[James Kosin]

On 2/18/2010 4:20 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Setting a watchpoint on address 0 seems like an entirely reasonable thing
> to do.  This change looks right to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roland

Okay with me.  Most platforms use address 0x0000 for the RESET vector.
Nice to catch; only problem was if it was a true RESET the information
is gone anyway.
If not a true RESET, the caller tried to call a function at 0x0000 which
then really isn't allowed under most circumstances.

James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/