Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw-breakpoint: Keep track of dr7 local enable bits

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:28:59PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 04:34:03PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 2010/2/19 K.Prasad <prasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > So, the thread's copy of DR7 (in thread->ptrace_dr7) stores the
> > > requested data even if the 'write' onto DR7 i.e. ptrace_write_dr7()
> > > failed. This can be the other way round i.e. populate the thread's copy
> > > of DR7 only if the write was successful.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > No. We store the new dr7 value only if ptrace_set_dr7() didn't fail.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > I think it will be in consonance with the v2.6.32 behaviour as well. For
> > > instance, in the code snippet from ptrace_set_debugreg() in v2.6.32
> > > below:
> > >                for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> > >                        if ((DR7_MASK >> ((data >> (16 + 4*i)) & 0xf)) & 1)
> > >                                return -EIO;
> > >                child->thread.debugreg7 = data;
> > >
> > > The thread's copy of DR7 is populated only if the incoming data is
> > > found to be valid.
> > 
> > 
> > This is also what does this patch. thread->ptrace_dr7 is only
> > changed if ptrace_set_dr7() succeeded.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> hmmh...I see...looks like I experienced single-bit ECC as I read
> the patch :-) Yes, let debugreg7 store values only when a valid bkpt
> request comes in.



Great :) I was feeling uncomfortable to push that out without
your ack. May I add it?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/